924Board.org

CorsePerVita · Joined: 25 Jul 2008 Posts: 1992 Location: Redmond, Oregon

http://bend.craigslist.org/cto/1380007025.html

Eh, weight distribution epic fail?
_________________
- 1977 Porsche 924 2.0 N/A (Trackday Project)
- 1979 Porsche 924 2.0 N/A (The other daily)
- 1980 Porsche 931 (Daily)
- 1987 Lamborghini Jalpa
- 1999 Ducati 900SS

Rocco R16V · Joined: 03 May 2009 Posts: 497 Location: PNW

even though the weight dist is a bit off from the ideal, i think it will still handle better than most cars, should be fast too!
_________________
"Government exists to protect us from each other. Where government has gone beyond its limits is in deciding to protect us from ourselves. "
Ronald Reagan

ideola · Joined: 01 Oct 2004 Posts: 15550 Location: Spring Lake MI

From what I recall, the weight distribution of the SBC wasn't that much heavier. I think Porschev or Applebit might have some stats on that...
_________________
erstwhile owner of just about every 924 variant ever made

v8carreragts · Joined: 05 Sep 2003 Posts: 665 Location: Tucson, AZ

On my car I have the CGTS front bumper and GTS lights. When I add the 'glass hood the front of the car will be lighter that stock. With the elimination of the OEM undercoating (50# worth) the sunroof and motor, (I made a steel panel to weld in) and the Euro rear bumper, the car will be approx 2700#. That's with a gen I small block with aluminum heads, intake, water pump, mini starter and headers.

I've been weighing everthing throughout the project.

That 924 shouldn't be much different than a 951 when complete.